The name of Ernest Dohnányi (born Hungary, 1877, died USA, 1960) hardly 
rings a bell today except in Hungary. Even those who remember him are 
likely to be familiar with only one of his works, his Variations on a 
Nursery Song for piano and orchestra (1914). His stage works, orchestral
 compositions including symphonies, concerti etc., vocal compositions 
such as the Stabat Mater (1953), as well as his numerous chamber music 
and piano compositions are now seldom played. One would search long to 
find his music in any concert programme. Yet at his peak he was one of 
the most versatile and influential musicians of his time. His youthful 
Piano Quintet (1895) was so highly esteemed by Brahms at its first 
performance that he personally made arrangements for it to be performed 
in the Vienna Tonkünstlerverein.
It was his cellist father and 
Károly Förstner, a cathedral organist, who gave Dohnányi his first 
lessons in piano and theory. Having completed his secondary education he
 went to Budapest from his native town Pozsony (now Bratislava) in order
 to study at the Budapest Academy. (His school friend Béla Bartók 
followed suit.) There he studied piano with Thomán and composition with 
Koessler. After receiving his diploma in 1897 he spent the summer of the
 same year with composer and pianist Eugen d’Albert (Glasgow-born but of
 German-French-Italian origins) to whom, in 1898, Dohnányi eventually 
dedicated his First Piano Concerto, a work which received the 
Bösendorfer Prize.
It was in 1898 that Hans Richter, one of the 
leading conductors of the time, asked Dohnányi to join him in London as 
the soloist in Beethoven’s Fourth Piano Concerto. This tour, during 
which he gave 32 concerts in two months, established him as a concert 
pianist of the first rank. His interpretative power in the Austro-German
 classics, above all Mozart, Beethoven and Schubert, as well as his 
dedicated involvement in chamber music playing, made him one of the most
 sought-after performers of his time. His pianistic ability combined 
with improvisational panache was such that when later his memory 
deserted him from time to time it was a popular pleasure among 
connoisseurs to hear how he wriggled out of trouble by stylishly 
improvising passages that led back to the original notes. It was 
Richter, too, who in 1902 introduced Dohnányi’s Symphony No 1 in D 
minor, in Manchester.
The great violinist Joachim, friend of 
Brahms, was also friend to Dohnányi whom he invited to Berlin where the 
composer was offered a professorship at the Hochshule in 1905. Ten years
 there were paralleled and followed by various prestigious appointments 
not only at the Budapest Academy but also as chief conductor of the 
Philharmonic Orchestra, a position which he held for the best part of 25
 years from 1919. In 1931 he became the musical director of Hungarian 
Radio where he worked until 1944. With all these involvements he found 
time not only for composition but also for selecting concert repertoire 
with the aim of raising musical standards in Hungary. He gave as many as
 120 performances there in one year. No wonder that Bartók saw in him a 
leading provider of Hungarian musical life. For four decades Dohnányi 
dominated the musical scene in his home country and beyond. It is to 
Dohnányi’s credit that although his musical temperament and outlook were
 very different from Bartók’s and Kodály’s he put his phenomenal 
performing ability to their service. In fact he recognised Bartók’s 
genius well before others and gave him practical support while his own 
countrymen were predominantly hostile. His long-standing relationship 
with America made him a welcome refugee when, after a few years stay in 
Austria (1944-1948), he decided to leave Europe for the New World. There
 he indefatigably continued his musical activities, not only in his 
capacity as pianist/composer-in- residence at Florida State University, 
but also as a touring performer. One of his last concerts was in 1956 at
 the Edinburgh Festival. Working to the very end of his life, he died 
during a recording session at the age of 83.
In this series 
featuring ‘The Romantic Piano Concerto’, Dohnányi’s two works in this 
form are fitting examples of the genre because he was throughout his 
life a romantic both at heart and in his musical language. Although he 
died as late as 1960 he had little to do with the musical developments 
of the twentieth century. The two Concertos on this recording evoke a 
world which belongs to the nineteenth century. Dohnányi continued to 
compose in a style deeply rooted in the Austro-German classical 
tradition exemplified by Brahms. His merit as a composer is that he was 
able to prolong meaningfully the classico/romantic past, of which he was
 one of the last practitioners, well into this century, both in his 
chamber and orchestral music. This he did with elegance, wit, and 
stylish virtuosity. The two Piano Concertos are fine examples of his 
fluent mastery of form and instrumentation.
The Piano Concerto No
 1 in E minor, from the years of 1897–8, follows the traditional 
three-movement structure: fast-slow-fast. However, the first movement 
Allegro is preceded by an introductory ‘Adagio maestoso’ whose main 
theme is picked up, albeit in a modified way, by the first Allegro 
subject proper. It is characterised by a diminished 5th drop resolving 
upwards a minor second (E-A#-B). The structural importance of the 
introductory Adagio maestoso gains marked significance as it is 
reiterated at the end of the movement. There is nothing in the musical 
language—that is, in the rhythm, melody, harmony and musical structure 
as well as in the traditional orchestration—which Brahms would have 
found unfamiliar.
The second movement, with its largely pizzicato
 orchestral accompaniment, is in A minor. Its melodic contour is also 
derived in a subtle way from the ‘Adagio maestoso’. The last 
twenty-eight bars, during which the piano plays the opening theme 
originally introduced by the orchestra with broad arpeggio chords 
finally establishing the key of A major (known as ‘tierce de Picardi’), 
is an old trick, but it works superbly.
The third movement, 
Vivace, brings to its dramatic conclusion the opening Adagio maestoso 
theme which, motto-like, gives unity to the whole composition. Of the 
three movements this is perhaps the most Brahmsian in style with its 
lush sixths and thirds. A chorale-like theme played by the orchestra 
interrupts the flow of the cadenza. Then a frenetic coda in 6/8 is 
approached via a series of trills. Finally the time signature changes 
again, now to 2/4 Presto, leading the composition to its conclusion—not 
in E minor, but in the triumphant E major.
The Piano Concerto No 2
 in B minor belongs to the post-World War II years, 1946–7. Thus nearly 
fifty years separate the two Concertos on this CD. The composer’s 
compositional style, however, shows little change. It is amazing to 
think that Bartók’s Third Piano Concerto was written two years before 
this one. The first Allegro movement of this Concerto also opens with a 
quasi-motto theme. There is something Hungarian to it both melodically 
and rhythmically. Among several striking passages the one which stands 
out is the ‘Poco meno mosso’ entry of a theme which more or less 
dominates the second half of the movement.
The second movement, 
‘Adagio poco rubato’, again evokes Hungarian, or rather a stylised 
Hungarian gipsy style in G minor. It ends in G major with a gradually 
speeded-up repetition of the note G in the orchestra, leading directly 
without a break to the third movement, Allegro vivace. The ostinato G is
 spiced by a minor second clash which gives backing to the entry of the 
energetic main theme. The motto theme of the first movement reappears, 
albeit en passant, over a long held E in the bass. This gives way to a 
spirited unfolding of the material and the eventual conclusion of the 
Concerto.
It is incorrect to suggest, as some do, that Dohnányi 
bridged the gap in Hungarian music between Liszt and Bartók. This is not
 so, since he did not share their innovating and pioneering 
compositional genius. He got stuck in a style somewhere between Brahms 
and Saint-Saëns. What he offers, however, is an unfailing romantic 
spirit which to this day can evoke the musical values of yesterday, 
which he served and defended with such inspired dedication. Hyperion
Ernő Dohnányi (1877-1960)
    
Piano Concerto No 1 in E minor Op 5 [44'56]
    
Piano Concerto No 2 in B minor Op 42 [29'44]
Conductor – Fedor Glushchenko
Leader [Orchestra] – Geoffrey Trabichoff
Orchestra – BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra
Piano – Martin Roscoe
quarta-feira, 6 de março de 2024
DOHNÁNYI : Piano Concerto No 1 In E Minor • Piano Concerto No 2 In B Minor (Martin Roscoe · BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra · Fedor Glushchenko) (1993) Serie The Romantic Piano Concerto – 6 | FLAC (image+.cue), lossless
Assinar:
Postar comentários (Atom)

https://nitroflare.com/view/44E3388C053A639/The_Romantic_Piano_Concerto_–_6_♦_Dohnanyi_(1993
ResponderExcluir_Hyperion_–_CDA66684)_FLAC.rar
https://tbit.to/7j2u1b1k7ew1/The Romantic Piano Concerto – 6 ♦ Dohnanyi (1993, Hyperion – CDA66684) FLAC.rar.html